Virtually everything I know about the technical aspects of photography.
prime lenses are always sharpest, lightest (unless you carry so many around with you)
invest in lenses not bodies 35mm+ 50mm+ 85mm+ 200mm+
see what lenses (fish lens / 2.8 super zooms ) can be rented for special needs.
you will be married to a mounting system, choose wisely or plan specific systems for specific tasks
invest in lenses & crop factor rather than bodies
glass always has a longer value over time.
prices of lenses are easily doubled for just incremental feature (1.8 $100-200 1.4 $500)
invest in light meters if you make space for it in your work flow, especially in studio work/flash work.
teleconvertors can double but you loose an F stop or more, and focus/vibration issues are added
Adapters could be use for other systems/mounts but usually loose autofocus and metering
F1.4 prime-2.8 zooms lenses are aways very expensive and heavy
DOF F1.4 is very narrow DOF F4+ is wider depth of field
putting a UV filter will diminish the final image, use sparingly or not at all if you can be careful
all kit lenses are typically crap 100$ won't be recooped if you try to sell.
Non Full frame bodies (dx) multiples the focal length of attached
DSLR over 20MP is equiltivant to 35mm scans of negatives
Cameras that have 32MP is greater than the starting level of medium format
Watch for Actuations on Digital cameras as shutters do wear out
Evil cameras are much smaller but typically has smaller sensors, and require different lenses that use normal F ranges or very expensive Fast lenses.
Bridge cameras, put better glass (sometimes up to 2.8F fixed) but still use a tiny sensor and suffers from crop factor.
When considering sensor size always based on density of pixels / physical size, there will be a physical limit to the resolving power
Iso noise is more important than megapixels
High end professional cameras are 2-3 better stop in iso performance (500-3k-8k)
{ future understanding of crop factor and focal length }
more blades in the lens the better round out of focus point light
Nikon DX Crops DX/FX lenses and multiple focal length by F1.4
BW digital cameras have more resolution that color
Don't forget minimal focus distances
Weight will be a hinderance during travel
taking really good pictures will be the focal point rather than the travel (photographic trips)
Built in flashes are typically only work with shorter focal length
the faster the lens (larger the apature) the more expensive it is
the sharpest is always 2 stops above the lowest settings (unless specially noted to be sharp wide open)
telephoto > 75 mm (flattens requires more distance)
portrait lens is 85 mm (flattens requires more distance)
standard 50mm (equilvant of eyesight)
lanscape < 28 mm (distortion requires less distance)
buy one large nurtralizers/circular filter rather than indvidual ones
forcing yourself to be compose an image ala film is much more benificial for the creative process
it's reecommended that you shoot film to hone your craft.
generally the bigger the sensor the shorter the focal length can be reached and the better DOF which will expose the bokah that is covented by many.
Film has far higher resolution given the cost,
lighting is everything (be it ambient or artificial)
low light performance is typically very expensive
think of your target subject matter
cheap lense have F3.5+
composition rules all
night shots are better with smaller devices
rule of thirds
don't blame the camera, learn to use to it's limits/strengths.
Video problems (rolling shutter) is a common problem with SLR that use CMOS, Older Video cameras use CCD (there are fixes but require post processing)
Printing, be aware that eye has a finite limit of resolution based on viewing distance, the father away you are the lower the resolution of the document
Calibration is required between LCD, printer.
LED typically has a blue tint that has to be adjusted for. CRT are better at color matching. Full Gamut monitors are expensive.
ConsumerIT
Friday, 5 October 2012
Monday, 30 July 2012
F!ack that apple universe and other non prorpiratary standards
I've always considered data just that data when it comes to information and that includes media.
The latest toys in a big way force you to choose. the Apple universe only supports so much and they are very rigid about it. I guess it's for the user experience but it's a painful leap when common standards aren't supported and of course interopability with other system is the last thing on there mind. Only the open source people will rejoice but they don't work on platforms such as Ipad or the lastest android idea.
The basic idea that a lot of people will need to have duplicate libraries or redo them to insure that both standars can read them. http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=92346 for reference.
mac PC universe
Macs are the propritary ones aside from the windows users who unknowingly used wma that would be your fault.
To sync to the Touch, iTunes needs to see the files. The touch supports the following audio formats:
quote:AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), Protected AAC (from iTunes Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible (formats 2, 3, and 4), Apple Lossless, AIFF, and WAV
and the following video formats:
furthing that, if yo uget into the ipad world the video seems (again another issue)quote:H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Low-Complexity version of the H.264 Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; H.264 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Baseline Profile up to Level 3.0 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats
Retina display, it's just 4x the resolution of the older ipads ( 2048 x 1536 ) your videos at 1:1 are now smaller, sure scale up but it will just use 4 pixels to represent 1. bfd.
Ebooks? I guess that's worth another post.
Sunday, 22 July 2012
Pirch98 sound settings
go to Highlight and turn off Been on highlight message.. this always drives me insane as it beeps everytime I talk. WHY is this a default >,<
Tuesday, 3 July 2012
Use Raid 0 for OS (with cavets)
You should seperate the data you use vs the programs and OS that you use.
Additionally assuming you can plan ahead build the OS and programs on Raid 0 which will double your read write speeds that allows the system to self distruct if something goes wrong but can easily recover if you have an ongoing backup solution..
instead of the 1200MBit/sec you can have 2400Mbit/sec (remember that this is shared so it drops down by half or more with multiple operations)
Additionally assuming you can plan ahead build the OS and programs on Raid 0 which will double your read write speeds that allows the system to self distruct if something goes wrong but can easily recover if you have an ongoing backup solution..
instead of the 1200MBit/sec you can have 2400Mbit/sec (remember that this is shared so it drops down by half or more with multiple operations)
OTA HDTV in GVRD (free)
I don't want to pay for TV signals, the why bundles work you typically more economical to however I don't like the idea of being cut off from local news. Fortunately this is where OTA comes in. This is just a pointer to a old page that has kept up with making as well as recieving the 4-6 OTA channels.
- CBC – CH. 58.1
- Global – CH. 22.2
- CTV – CH. 33.1
- Omni – CH. 42.1
I hope allow my multiple TV's through a signal cable but that would mean having multiple wires throughout the house.
I may have to resort to streaming via DLNA.. won't that be fun. http://alenblog.wordpress.com/2011/04/24/watch-online-tv-ppstream-pplive-etc-on-tv-via-dlna/
Monday, 2 July 2012
Maximum throughput
theses are real life bandwidths unless noted
Real World Speeds | ||||
Mbit/sec | MB/sec | |||
Conventional PCI (32-bit) | shared? Theorectical max | 1064 | 133 | Therorictical |
AGP 8X | 2,100 | Therorictical | ||
PCI Express 1x | 250 [500]* | 250 | Therorictical | |
PCI Express 2x | 500 [1000]* | 500 | Therorictical | |
PCI Express 4x | 1000 [2000]* | 1000 | Therorictical | |
PCI Express 8x | 2000 [4000]* | 2000 | Therorictical | |
PCI Express 16x | 4000 [8000]* | 4000 | Therorictical | |
PCI Express 32x | 8000 [16000]* | 8000 | Therorictical | |
IDE (ATA100) | 800 | 100 | Therorictical | |
IDE (ATA133) | 1064 | 133 | Therorictical | |
IEEE1394B [Firewire 800] | ~100 * | 800 | 100 | Therorictical |
Esata | 640 | 80 | ||
Sata | nt | nt | ||
Sata II (3Gbit) | nt | nt | ||
Sata III (6Gbit) | velociraptor 10K 600GB | 1200 | 150 | |
Sata III (6Gbit) | Newest 2012 SSD | 4440 | 555 | |
USB 2.0 | Using a ssd | 280 | 35 | |
USB 3.0 | high speed memory or raid config | 880 | 110 | |
Thunderbolt | high speed memory or raid config | 9600 | 1200 | |
100BaseT Ethernet | Sustained | 88 | 11 | |
1000BaseT Ethernet | Sustained | 640 | 80 | |
1000BaseT Ethernet | Burst | 1200 | 150 | |
Rogers 3G | 8 | 1 | ||
Rogers LTE Existing | 20 | 2.5 | ||
Rogers LTE Future | 40 | 5 |
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
Truth about LED backlit
LED is a newer technology primary reasons for introduction is lower power consumption in laptops (CCFL of the past drain the battery very quickly in comparision) and the longer life of the LED itself.
The problem is if you care about color. LED backlight especially in the lower end of the pricepoint have inaccurate color. ACER is known for this, samsung apparenty has a better reputation but it has to do with the design of the LED, it does not generate white light instead it gives off a blueish white which will effect your colors accuracy.
It's actually cheaper to make LED but because of the limited supply it has jaked up the price.
In short LED backlit laptops are good since portability is more important but when it comes to desktop units, color if that is important to you shouldn't be sacrificed and you need to look at the screens for yourself if you can tell.
Also remember backlit can mean edge lit the most common or more expensive backlit where the entire back is being lit. the TV market gave up on this because it was so expensive to produce.
The problem is if you care about color. LED backlight especially in the lower end of the pricepoint have inaccurate color. ACER is known for this, samsung apparenty has a better reputation but it has to do with the design of the LED, it does not generate white light instead it gives off a blueish white which will effect your colors accuracy.
It's actually cheaper to make LED but because of the limited supply it has jaked up the price.
In short LED backlit laptops are good since portability is more important but when it comes to desktop units, color if that is important to you shouldn't be sacrificed and you need to look at the screens for yourself if you can tell.
Also remember backlit can mean edge lit the most common or more expensive backlit where the entire back is being lit. the TV market gave up on this because it was so expensive to produce.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)